I've spent the past three years running and refining this system inside a small law firm. In 120 days, I build it inside yours, train your team to run it, and hand it over. You keep the system.
Family law Immigration Special education Employment Criminal defense
In these areas, people are usually looking for help with something stressful and personal. Before they call, they Google, scroll through social media, ask friends, compare, and try to figure out who they trust.
If that search is not finding you, you feel it: business is inconsistent, too much depends on referrals, or you are paying for marketing that stops the day you stop paying, and nobody at your firm can run it themselves.
This works best for small, owner-led firms, with or without a marketing department. If you have one, they get a system to run. If you don't, we train the person who will.
I use the same core system I’ve already proven, then build it around your firm: your topics, your clients, your intake process, and the way you communicate. The framework is proven. The way it works inside your practice is built for you.
Built for law firms, and I take other owner-led professional practices selectively.
For many small firms, the fees from one or two new clients pay for the entire install.
I'm Tim Ravare. For the past three years, I've led marketing and built new systems inside a special education law firm in California.
I helped take the firm from barely being seen online to a full consultation calendar. Along the way, I built the content engine, website and booking flow, internal AI tools, and team processes needed to support that growth.
When something wasn’t working, I could do more than recommend a change. I could build it.
That experience taught me how the marketing, technology, intake, and day-to-day work of a firm have to fit together.
I bring the same proven core system into your firm, build it around the way you actually work, train your team to run it, and hand the whole thing over after 120 days.
This is the system I run at Hope4Families, where I lead marketing in-house. When I joined, the firm had almost no online presence and no repeatable way to turn attention into consultations.
Over the next three years, I built and ran the system from inside the firm: the content, website and booking flow, the processes behind them, and eventually the internal tools that made parts of the work easier for the team.
These are whole-firm results over three years. The attorneys, staff, reputation, and systems I built and ran all contributed. All figures are as of September 2026; platform counts are public profile totals.
I bring the same proven core, then build it around the way your firm actually works: your expertise, your clients, your content, your intake process, and your team.
The core system is where we start. At Hope4Families, the deeper builds have included a tool that reads a full case file and drafts the legal complaint, and reporting that shows the partners how work moves through the firm. Builds like those are scoped separately, once the core is running and we can see where your firm actually loses time.
The whole system as one fixed build: four milestones, roughly a month each, and a finish line. Not a retainer that never ends.
Intake tracking live before any content goes out, so every inquiry from here on records where it came from. Baseline numbers captured, your site and profiles fixed, your first filming day.
Done whenYour formats locked in your brand, the pipeline live on your accounts, content publishing weekly, Google Business Profile built out.
Done whenYour monthly numbers page running, and four AI-assisted workflows installed on your firm's own computer and accounts: scripts for your practice area, one video turned into a week of posts, captions with your compliance language, and the numbers report. Your person trained on all of it.
Done whenBy this point, the system should work without me. Your designated person runs the full cycle using your accounts, your workflows, and the documentation we built together. I step back, watch for gaps, and fix anything that still depends on me. Once they can run it on their own, the install is complete. You then get 30 days of support while your team settles into running it without me.
Done whenEach milestone ends with something working inside your firm. You pay when the work listed under that milestone is complete, not because another month passed. If we stop between milestones, you keep everything already built.
By then, your team can:
And if that person leaves? The documentation is written for a stranger, not for them. The content backlog is built ahead on purpose, so the calendar keeps running while you train someone new, and the 30-day tail after handover exists for exactly that kind of week.
Count it. Every line is yours when I leave.
A legal marketing agency runs $2,000 to $5,000 a month depending on your market, every month, for as long as you keep paying. Call it $3,000 and that is $36,000 in year one, as an ongoing operating expense. A full-time marketing hire costs a full salary plus employer payroll taxes and benefits, every year. Neither is a bad decision. They are just both recurring. This is the third shape: a finite install with a handover, and it ends with you owning the machine.
Four milestones. $2,500 as each one is finished. After the fourth, I stop billing you.
You approve each milestone before the next payment, and you keep everything already built.
No hourly billing. No scope-creep invoices.
You also carry your own tool subscriptions, roughly $100 to $500 a month depending on how much AI you run. All of it lives on accounts your firm owns, so when I leave, nothing turns off.
This is built for firms where the fees from one or two new clients cover the entire install. Whether that is true for you depends on your practice area, your average matter value, your intake capacity and your conversion rate. We look at those numbers together before either of us agrees to anything.
No pitch deck. Bring your numbers, I will bring mine.
Book a 30-minute discovery callBecause you are not buying three years of growth. You are buying the system, the documentation, the training, and the lessons those three years produced. I already made the mistakes and threw out what did not work. The 120 days are for building it into your firm and training your team, not figuring out what works from scratch.
If you want someone else to run your marketing indefinitely, an agency may be the better choice. I do a different job. I build the capability inside your firm, train your team to run it, and then leave. You keep what I built.
Many of these arrangements fail exactly there: the consultant goes, and by month six nothing is publishing. I build against that. A content backlog is stacked ahead of handover, so the calendar survives a bad month. The documentation is written for a stranger, so it survives turnover. In month four, your person runs the full cycle while I step back and watch. And you get 30 days of support after handover.
I get access to your marketing accounts, your site, and your intake tracking. Client matter files never enter the marketing systems. Custom builds that touch client files, like the drafting tool, are scoped separately with their own data rules. Every build comes with clear rules: what data AI can touch, what it can’t, what always gets human review before it goes anywhere. At handover my access is removed and every credential we touched is rotated, and I will sign your firm’s confidentiality agreement. I have a data addendum if your firm wants one.
You or a client-facing representative should expect about an hour on camera each week, plus quick answers on approvals. Your designated person will spend a few hours a week learning and running the system during the build, then roughly three to five hours a week after handover. I front-load access and setup at kickoff because you have a firm to run. The process is built around that.
You don’t need to be technical, and neither does the person who runs it. They do not need to code or understand AI beyond the workflows I set up. I train them while I build, and they should expect about three to five hours a week once I’m gone.
Because this is a finite build, not an ongoing service. You’re paying me to put the system in place, train your team, and leave it with you. Whether $10,000 makes sense for your firm depends on your average matter value, intake capacity, and what one or two additional clients are worth. We look at that before either of us commits.
Usually, the problem isn’t that the firm picked the wrong software. Someone posted for a month, bought a tool, or launched a process, and nobody kept it going. I build this into how your firm already works and train someone on your team to own it before I leave.
Often, yes. Referrals are valuable, and I’m not trying to replace them. The problem is depending on them for nearly all of your growth. The system gives you another way to be found, and it can support the referrals you already get. When someone hears your name and looks you up, they find a firm that clearly explains what it knows and who it helps. If you currently have very little online visibility, I’ll also be realistic about the timeline. Organic growth takes time. Show me how your last twenty clients found you and I can give you a much better read on where the opportunity is.
This only works with a visible expert on camera: you, or someone at your firm your clients will actually meet, for about an hour each week, guided. I direct the first sessions, and your team is trained on the editing workflow, so nobody needs editing skills. If that's a no, this isn't the right build, and it's better we both know before the call than after it.
About ten minutes of questions first, then you pick your time.
